Skip to content

Walker documentation partly outdated #8

@Technologicat

Description

@Technologicat

The documentation and docstrings of Walker need updating:

  • ctx is passed by name, not positionally.
  • ctx is just an arbitrary user-defined name; it has no special meaning. This is essentially a mechanism to pass in arbitrary named arguments that will be propagated following the rules explained in the documentation.
  • Some up-to-date usage examples with one and two ctx items would make the documentation easier to understand.

I could take a look at this and perhaps submit a PR later.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions