Skip to content

Possibly wrong checkpoints for M2 and L #2

@jglaser

Description

@jglaser

I am trying to reproduce the SCIQ results from the SC'23 paper using Eleuther's LM evaluation harness.

These are my results

Model SciQ PIQA
forge-bio 0.788  
forge-che 0.821  
forge-eng 0.793  
forge-mat 0.777  
forge-phy 0.761  
forge-soc 0.82  
forge-s1 0.787  
forge-s2 0.783  
forge-s3 0.805  
forge-s4 0.86  
forge-m1 0.82  
forge-m2 0.574 0.5577
forge-l 0.242  

The highlighted scores are much lower than the others, and than what is expected from Table 8 of the paper. A quick check of the evaluation logs (data/eval/forge-m2) suggests that these are roughly the scores of the m2 checkpoint at iteration 1000, and probably of some very early checkpoint of forge-l.

I downloaded the checkpoints from the links in the README.md. I suspect that the dropbox versions were somehow mixed up.

Command line

 lm_eval --model hf --model_args pretrained=forge-bio,parallelize=True --tasks sciq --device cuda

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions