-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Description
I've come across these ontology terms which have the same samples:
"DOID:285 ! hairy cell leukemia": [ "lymphoma, malignant, hairy B-cell cell line:MLMA.CNhs11935.10775-110G1", "hairy cell leukemia cell line:Mo.CNhs11843.10712-109I1" ],
and
"DOID:1040 ! chronic lymphocytic leukemia": [ "lymphoma, malignant, hairy B-cell cell line:MLMA.CNhs11935.10775-110G1", "hairy cell leukemia cell line:Mo.CNhs11843.10712-109I1" ],
This seems to mean that the avg annotation column in the results is being given both terms separated by a comma e.g.
ACTGAGTAGATAGCAT-1,"DOID:1040 ! chronic lymphocytic leukemia, DOID:285 ! hairy cell leukemia",0.342386323
This is a bit annoying to parse when the ontology names themselves are often comma separated e.g. CL:0002397 ! CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte
I've not checked if there are other cases like this of duplicate ontology terms. Is this intended?
Best,