[Idea]: Relative paths not runfiles

[arrdem]

An earlier version of py_venv relied on using relative paths from the venv to the interpreter's actual root.

We moved away from this because, after the user symlinks a .venv dir out of bazel-bin or a .runfiles tree, the relative path is wrong. However within the .runfiles and action time trees, those relative paths are correct.

Now that we have machinery which is extremely careful about dereferencing "just enough" symlinks to get into either 1) a runfile tree or 2) an execroot, it would be more reliable and generally correct to revisit using relative paths from the partially dereferenced interpreter to user's specified interpreter binary.

This lets us ditch the .runfiles library code, and support the actions directory layout in a principled way as opposed to what we're doing at present which has proven operationally difficult.

Maybe blocks #703 based on some test failures.

Has consequences for the uv build machinery.

[arrdem]

Discussed some with @dzbarsky; need to spend some time poking at this.