Dyalog versions not referred to in a consistent format

[5jt]

For example:

• Dyalog 19.0
• Dyalog version 19

We always include the “v” or “version”, and use both the major and minor release numbers. For example, Dyalog v19.0. We started doing this about ten years ago, mainly to remove any potential ambiguity between referring to releases and user meetings, and it looks strange to me to see it written otherwise now! Whatever convention you adopt, it would be good to use it throughout. As both Dyalog and Cider are mentioned, it would remove potential ambiguity to always include the product name with the version number (for example, “Do not use the command for versions prior to 0.37.3” on https://aplteam.github.io/Cider/user-commands/#update-cider).
— Fiona Smith