GH-48497: [GLib][Ruby] Add PartitionNthOptions #48518
Merged
+227
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
stenlarsson
force-pushed
the
glib-partition-nth-options
branch
from
47605f2 to
0993208
Compare
kou
force-pushed
the
glib-partition-nth-options
branch
from
0993208 to
745f7f2
Compare
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 3 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 43273fd. There weren't enough matching historic benchmark results to make a call on whether there were regressions. The full Conbench report has more details. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
The
PartitionNthOptionsclass is not available in GLib/Ruby, and it is used together with thepartition_nth_indicescompute function.What changes are included in this PR?
This adds the
PartitionNthOptionsclass to GLib.Are these changes tested?
Yes, with Ruby unit tests.
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, a new class.