Skip to content

Improve examples of using parquet reader to be more concise #9161

@alamb

Description

@alamb

if the follow up about the fourth pattern is needed, i/we can handle that aswell

I am not quite sure what you mean by this

Sorry i meant i can improve the examples if needed

That would be great if you have the time -- specifically I think applying both these comments to all the examples would improve the readability 🙏

Originally posted by @alamb in #9116 (comment)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions