New Model for IRM soil moisture analysis

[prske]

Hi,

New output scheme for soil moisture analysis looks like this:

class DatasetAnalysis(BaseModel):
    dataset_id: str
    time_period: List[datetime]
    irrigation_events_detected: int
    precipitation_events: int
    high_dose_irrigation_events: int
    high_dose_irrigation_events_dates: List[datetime]
    field_capacity: float
    wilting_point: float
    stress_level: float
    number_of_saturation_days: int
    saturation_dates: List[datetime]
    no_of_stress_days: int
    stress_dates: List[datetime]

Can you help us with new json-ld structure to be in line with this?

Thanks in advance!

Regard

[prske]

Hi @rapw3k

I just want to check in if there are any updates regarding this.

Thanks and regards.

[prske]

Hi @rapw3k

Are there any updates regarding this?

Also, because of agstack/OpenAgri-IrrigationManagement#5 (comment),
new output scheme would be:

class DatasetAnalysis(BaseModel):
    dataset_id: str
    time_period: List[datetime]
    irrigation_events_detected: int
    irrigation_events_dates: List[datetime]
    precipitation_events: int
    precipitation_events_dates: List[datetime]
    high_dose_irrigation_events: int
    high_dose_irrigation_events_dates: List[datetime]
    field_capacity: float
    wilting_point: float
    stress_level: float
    number_of_saturation_days: int
    saturation_dates: List[datetime]
    no_of_stress_days: int
    stress_dates: List[datetime]

Regards.

[rapw3k]

Hi @prske sorry about my delay.
I am catching up, regarding this model, i would model like this:

{
"@context": [
"https://w3id.org/ocsm/main-context.jsonld"
],
"@id": "https://example.org/analysis/dataset-analysis-001",
"@type": "DatasetAnalysis",
"identifier":"ds-001",
"period": {
"@type": "Interval",
"hasBeginning": {
"@type": "Instant",
"inXSDDateTimeStamp": "2025-04-01T00:00:00Z"
},
"hasEnd": {
"@type": "Instant",
"inXSDDateTimeStamp": "2025-09-30T23:59:59Z"
}
},
"irrigationEventsDetected": 3,
"irrigationEventsDates": [ "2025-05-15T00:00:00Z", "2025-05-16T00:00:00Z", "2025-06-22T00:00:00Z", "2025-06-23T00:00:00Z" ],
"precipitationEventsCount": 2,
"precipitationEventsDates": [ "2025-05-15T00:00:00Z", "2025-05-16T00:00:00Z" ],
"highDoseIrrigationEventsCount": 1,
"highDoseIrrigationEventsDates": [ "2025-05-15T00:00:00Z" ],
"hasMember": [
{
"@id": "https://example.org/observation/field-capacity",
"@type": "Observation",
"observedProperty": "https://w3id.org/ocsm/property/field_capacity",
"hasSimpleResult": 0.31,
"resultTime": "2025-04-01T00:00:00Z"
},
{
"@id": "https://example.org/observation/wilting-point",
"@type": "Observation",
"observedProperty": "https://w3id.org/ocsm/property/wilting_point",
"hasSimpleResult": 0.12,
"resultTime": "2025-04-01T00:00:00Z"
},
{
"@id": "https://example.org/observation/stress-level",
"@type": "Observation",
"observedProperty": "https://w3id.org/ocsm/property/stress_level",
"hasSimpleResult": 0.64,
"resultTime": "2025-07-20T00:00:00Z"
}
],
"numberOfSaturationDays": 4,
"saturationDates": [ "2025-05-15T00:00:00Z", "2025-05-16T00:00:00Z", "2025-06-22T00:00:00Z", "2025-06-23T00:00:00Z" ],
"numberOfStressDays": 5,
"stressDates": [ "2025-07-19T00:00:00Z", "2025-07-20T00:00:00Z", "2025-07-21T00:00:00Z", "2025-08-03T00:00:00Z", "2025-08-04T00:00:00Z" ]
}

one clarifications:

• is the DatasetAnalysis representing the dataset itself (of type DatasetAnalysis, and with id = dataset_id), or does it represent an analysis report of a specific dataset (with id = dataset_id). I assumed the former, if its different, then we would have to change

"identifier":"ds-001",

into something like

"analysisOf": {
"@id": "https://example.org/dataset/ds-001",
"@type": "dcat:Dataset",
"identifier": "ds-001"
},

[prske]

Hi @rapw3k

Thank you for providing new JSON-LD scheme.

• DatasetAnalysis represents an analysis report of specific dataset
• One more thing, there are no "resultTime" for "@type": "Observation", so I will just ignore it.

EDIT: I see that irrigation_events_dates: List[datetime] and precipitation_events_dates: List[datetime] are missing in the scheme, but I think I can figure it out from what you provided.

Regards.