Replies: 2 comments 4 replies
-
|
i think change major version by hardfork do not need. in my opinion, it is no problem with the v2 version. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
I think the version of AERGO and the hard forked version should be seen as separate. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The current version number
2.4.7is not compatible with the current hardfork number3It would be a good idea to make the major version to match the hardfork version
On this case we would change the next version to be something like
3.0.8or3.4.8instead of2.4.8The source code packages would change from
/v2/to/v3/And then when the next hardfork version 4 (V4) is released, the major version would be 4
Unless we make a direct jump from
/v2/to/v4/later (is this allowed?)What do you think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions