support for implicit / virtual resource?

[toumorokoshi]

Context: https://github.com/aep-dev/aepc/pull/1/files#r1332008974

There are resources that are more or less containers of other resources, rather than have any behavior in it's own right.

The question is: should these be expressed in the resource model via some specific property?

[toumorokoshi]

My opinion: I don't think we need to express these any differently. Container resource should still have standard fields: they will just be fairly bare-bones.

One reason is that even with a resource that only contains other resources, it still needs an id, and likely additional CRUDL operations to operate on them.

If there's a special property that makes them differ from a fundamental resource, then I think there's a good motivation to specify them.