Skip to content

Branch naming style #25

@adamzev

Description

@adamzev

I propose that we have a development ("develop" or "dev") branch and master branch (the currently deployed version).

We can have other short-lived branches that follow this style:

{reason}-{1 to 3 word description}-{id-type}-{id}

Reasons would be limited to "bug", "feature", "refactor", "hotfix" or "spike" (spike for experiments).

So for example, to work on issue #23, I could name it "feature-add-lineup-selector-issue-23". Maybe that's a bit long. Should we try to limit the description to a word? Or always use issues (rather than stories, or other ids). So it could be "feature-lineup-23"

I'm going to set up CICD (Travis CI probably) on the project so I don't know if that matters for branch names other than for separating develop and master.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions