Explicitly include hbar in computations.

[i2000s]

I have noticed that you have implicitly set _hbar = 1_. Could it be more realistic to explicitly use the usual hbar in all computing?

[acroy]

Well, hbar=1 is as realistic as any other choice of units :-) We shouldn't use hbar in SI units, but maybe provide an option to change the value (although I have to say that I can't imagine anyone wants to use something else than hbar=1 in the calculations).

[i2000s]

Just to remind to document, at some stage, where the hbar is not shown in
your code is because of using hbar=1.

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:13 PM, acroy notifications@github.com wrote:

Well, hbar=1 is as realistic as any other choice of units :-) We shouldn't
use hbar in SI units, but maybe provide an option to change the value
(although I have to say that I can't imagine anyone wants to use something
else than hbar=1 in the calculations).

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4 (comment).