Replies: 5 comments 4 replies
-
|
What do you use to hammer slskd with so many searches? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'd expect that when you turn on those fallbacks, they're staggered to not make the server think it's being spammed. The issue is that "fallback" implies if one thing doesn't work, then go to the next - not try all these things at once. So it doesn't seem to support the common definition of fallback. If you don't want to stagger that's fine, but the UI should probably use some term other than fallback and make it clear this is going to generate a lot of concurrent searches. I'd recommend making the searches staggered so as not to break slskd however. There shouldn't ever be options to easily turn on that are going to cause regular failures. I also realize this is a severe weakness in slskd, that it doesn't throttle and allows the server to be spammed. Even within its own UI it's easy to trigger a ban and there are no settings/options to mitigate it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
From a high level perspective, just by looking at the UI of all the apps involved, it's really difficult to tell what's going on, so apologies if what I see at any point doesn't match the expected behaviour from your implementation. For most of the time I've been using slskd I've been able to see searches accumulate in its webUI, having them purged according to the timer defined in its options' retention setting. Right now I have this set to (for example) 60 minutes. But for the past couple of days I'm not seeing the same behaviour. Instead I'm seeing search terms pop into the UI and then disappear on their own. This may leave one or two searches in slskd for a minute then even those disappear. I dont have any idea why there's a difference right now compared to earlier. Some of the searches I see come up are in the form "*ig audio" - when searching for Big Audio. In manual testing I've done, using an asterisk to replace a single letter like that doesn't make any difference to the results. Neither has letter case anywhere in the search term. Diacritics do make a difference so that option in your indexers settings is valuable. Some of the difficulty in testing is due to the way Lidarr calls the indexers, as I also have Tidal and Deemix indexing active at the moment. To get a better understanding of what's going on, I typically disable the other indexers, as I don't usually see the behaviour Lidarr claims - "all indexers are used" |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.




Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
When slskd gets hammered with too many fallback searches, and I get banned, my average search performance goes down the tubes.
0 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions