The "No device model found" list contains strings that really do not have a model

[NielsLeenheer]

I think this overview would be more useful if it only included strings that either:

• have at least one model detected by a library
• have a model according to the source

Example:
http://thadafinser.github.io/UserAgentParserComparison/v4/user-agent-detail/93/d8/93d89c8a-7624-42f0-b3cf-372d90591b69.html

[ThaDafinser]

I've done that for botIsBot here
https://github.com/ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison/blob/master/bin/html/list-not-found-provider.php#L455

Would be similar here and for other lists as well.

The question is, if only the test suite is the master, or like you written have at least one result by a library is also valid

[NielsLeenheer]

I think the most useful way is to consider both. And if one of them has a model include it. It will probably add some noise from misidentifications, but then it will not depend just on the quality of library of the source. And if the source can't detect any model, but others can, it will be useful for the source to fix this.

[ThaDafinser]

Maybe provide two buttons for no detection

• from test suite
• from other results

[NielsLeenheer]

👍