Skip to content

negative pairs #9

@Flaick

Description

@Flaick

Hello, thank you for the excllcent work. Though I have a few conerns about the first stage of training with contrastive loss function. I notice that this work considers the negative pairs inside the video, which is different to the conventional way that considers the other samples in batch. I am wondering if I am understanding it correctly and if I am, do you analyze the evaluation performance with only the pretraining stage? Thank you in advance!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions