Standardize Directory Structure

[jrgleason]

Clearly this isn't going to work with 1 level I tried a certain structure in my commit but we should probably discuss it.

[jkuemerle]

Sounds good. I just looked at your PR and while the directory structure is interesting I think I would prefer to keep the structure flat, like I have in previous years. I would prefer just having a single child level directory under the repository root named for your session and then putting the content there. For reference take a look at the example folder "0 - Sample" or last years repo: https://github.com/TechConf/CodeMash2014 .

I have found this works well not just for content but also for adding in an entire repository as a subrepository as some people have also done in the past.

If you could refactor your PR to meet the above guidance that would be great or let me know and I can do it. Thanks!

[jrgleason]

Fixed but not sure I see how it is easier to have subprojects.

Let me know if there is anything else I will try to add even more content
in the run up.
On Dec 31, 2014 8:30 AM, "Joe Kuemerle" notifications@github.com wrote:

Sounds good. I just looked at your PR and while the directory structure is
interesting I think I would prefer to keep the structure flat, like I have
in previous years. I would prefer just having a single child level
directory under the repository root named for your session and then putting
the content there. For reference take a look at the example folder "0 -
Sample" or last years repo: https://github.com/TechConf/CodeMash2014 .

I have found this works well not just for content but also for adding in
an entire repository as a subrepository as some people have also done in
the past.

If you could refactor your PR to meet the above guidance that would be
great or let me know and I can do it. Thanks!

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
TechConf/CodeMash2015#4 (comment).