Replies: 1 comment
-
|
MungeSumstats supports standardizing variants to given genomic builds. In FunGen-xQTL we preprocess the data to align to a very specific reference genome file, see [qc_1] of https://cumc.github.io/xqtl-pipeline/code/data_preprocessing/genotype/VCF_QC.html# I don't know if MungeSumstats would do the same, or we would better build a reference genome package from our fasta file just in case : https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/BSgenome/inst/doc/BSgenomeForge.pdf |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I would like to revisit the issue of summary statistics munggling. This will be a preprocessing step to
pecotmr.I would like to provide tutorials / recipes / pipelines based on work from our Sinai colleagues, https://github.com/neurogenomics/MungeSumstats
Unfortunately this is not what's done in
xqtl-pipeline-- because at that time the person I delegate to implement this feature ignored my suggestion and wrote something on his own.Later Hao compared the differences:
StatFunGen/xqtl-protocol#212
We don't have to reinvent the wheels (again!) in
pecotmr. We just need a good vignette on preprocessing and basic QC using MungeSumstats?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions