Skip to content

feat: build image for dev and prod#30

Open
ngovinh2k2 wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
feat/build-image-for-dev-and-prod
Open

feat: build image for dev and prod#30
ngovinh2k2 wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
feat/build-image-for-dev-and-prod

Conversation

@ngovinh2k2
Copy link
Contributor

What?

Build image for dev and prod environment

Why?

From the request

How?

Testing?

  • Functional Testing
  • Security
  • Performance
  • Error Handling
  • Code Quality
  • Documentation
  • Database
  • Deployment
  • Final Review

Anything Else?

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Claude finished @ngovinh2k2's task —— View job


PR Review: Build Image for Dev and Prod

I've completed a comprehensive review of the workflow changes. This PR modifies the CI/CD pipeline to build Docker images for different environments (dev, prod, and release).

Todo List:

  • Read and analyze the workflow file changes
  • Review for GitHub Actions best practices
  • Check for security vulnerabilities
  • Assess performance considerations
  • Look for potential bugs or misconfigurations
  • Provide comprehensive review feedback

🔍 Review Feedback

Positive Changes

  1. Environment-specific tagging: Great approach to separate dev/prod images with clear naming strategy
  2. Multi-architecture support: Maintains linux/amd64,linux/arm64 builds for broader compatibility
  3. Simplified logic: Replaced complex docker/metadata-action with straightforward bash script
  4. Broader trigger scope: Now builds on both dev and main branch pushes, not just releases

🐛 Potential Issues

High Priority:

  1. Missing checkout validation (.github/workflows/cd-build-image.yml:21)
    ref: ${{ github.event_name == 'release' && 'main' || github.ref }}
    • Issue: For releases, this forces checkout of 'main' regardless of the release's target branch
    • Risk: Could build from wrong commit if release was created from non-main branch
    • Recommendation: Use ${{ github.event.release.tag_name }} for releases to build the exact tagged commit

Medium Priority:

  1. Removed useful metadata (.github/workflows/cd-build-image.yml:61)

    • Issue: Removed labels: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.labels }} from docker build
    • Impact: Loss of valuable image metadata (build date, commit SHA, etc.)
    • Recommendation: Consider adding back basic labels manually
  2. Removed build secrets (.github/workflows/cd-build-image.yml:61)

    • Issue: Removed secrets: GITHUB_TOKEN=${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
    • Impact: If Dockerfile uses secrets (BuildKit secrets), this could break builds
    • Status: Current Dockerfile doesn't use secrets, so this is okay for now

Low Priority:

  1. Version tag processing (.github/workflows/cd-build-image.yml:44)
    VERSION=${VERSION#v}
    • Issue: Assumes all release tags have 'v' prefix
    • Risk: Could create malformed tags if release doesn't follow 'vX.Y.Z' pattern
    • Recommendation: Add validation or make this optional

🔒 Security Assessment

  • Good: Proper permissions scoped to contents: read, packages: write
  • Good: Uses GITHUB_TOKEN (not personal tokens)
  • Good: No hardcoded secrets or credentials
  • Good: Checkout uses specific refs rather than default branch

Performance Considerations

  • Good: Multi-platform builds are efficient with buildx
  • Good: Dockerfile uses multi-stage builds and scratch base image
  • ⚠️ Note: Building on every dev/main push will increase CI usage - consider if this frequency is needed

🧪 Test Coverage Recommendations

The workflow lacks testing of the built images. Consider adding:

- name: Test image
  run: |
    docker run --rm ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:dev --version

📝 Suggested Improvements

  1. Fix release checkout:
ref: ${{ github.event_name == 'release' && github.event.release.tag_name || github.ref }}
  1. Add basic image labels:
labels: |
  org.opencontainers.image.source=https://github.com/${{ github.repository }}
  org.opencontainers.image.revision=${{ github.sha }}
  org.opencontainers.image.created=${{ env.BUILD_DATE }}

📊 Overall Assessment

This is a solid improvement that adds environment-specific image building. The main concern is the release checkout logic which should be fixed to ensure correct builds. The workflow is otherwise well-structured and follows good practices.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor fixes - Address the release checkout issue and consider adding back basic image labels.


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant