fix: build multi arch failed again

[ngovinh2k2]

What?

Build multi arch failed again

Why?

How?

Testing?

• Functional Testing
• Security
• Performance
• Error Handling
• Code Quality
• Documentation
• Database
• Deployment
• Final Review

Anything Else?

[claude]

Claude finished @ngovinh2k2's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Multi-Arch Build Fix

Reviewing the Dockerfile changes for code quality, security, and best practices.

Tasks:

• Read and analyze Dockerfile changes
• Check for security vulnerabilities
• Assess build performance implications
• Verify multi-arch build approach
• Review Docker best practices compliance
• Provide comprehensive feedback

Review Feedback

✅ Strengths

Multi-Architecture Support:

• Excellent use of --platform=$BUILDPLATFORM on line 4 for cross-compilation
• Proper implementation of TARGETOS and TARGETARCH build args (lines 19-20, 24-25)
• Correct CGO_ENABLED=0 for static binary compilation (line 23)

Security:

• Good use of scratch base image for minimal attack surface (line 35)
• Non-root user implementation with USER 1000 (line 48)
• Static binary compilation with security-focused ldflags (line 28)

Performance:

• Efficient layer caching with separate dependency download (lines 12-13)
• Multi-stage build reducing final image size
• Trimmed binary with -trimpath and -ldflags="-s -w" (lines 27-28)

🔍 Areas for Improvement

Security Concerns:

1. CA Certificates Location: Line 38 copies CA certs, but scratch images don't have /etc/ssl/certs/ directory structure. This might cause runtime issues with HTTPS requests.

2. USER Implementation: Using USER 1000 assumes this UID exists, but scratch doesn't have user management. Consider creating user in builder stage or using --user flag at runtime.

Build Robustness:
3. Dockerfile:32 - chmod 755 is redundant since Go builds already create executable binaries.

4. Dockerfile:41 - WORKDIR /app in scratch image doesn't create the directory. Consider explicit directory creation.

Code Quality:
5. Missing .dockerignore - No evidence of a .dockerignore file, which could lead to large build contexts.

🚨 Potential Issues

Runtime Problems:

• CA certificates might not work correctly in scratch environment
• Config file dependencies (/app/configs) copied without validation

Build Context:

• Copying entire source (.) could include unnecessary files affecting build performance

📋 Recommendations

# Improved CA certificates handling
COPY --from=builder /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt

# Or use distroless instead of scratch for better certificate support
FROM gcr.io/distroless/static-debian12

# Create explicit directory structure
FROM scratch
RUN mkdir -p /app /etc/ssl/certs

🧪 Test Coverage Considerations

• No evidence of Docker build testing in CI/CD
• Consider adding multi-arch build verification
• Test container startup and basic functionality
• Validate HTTPS certificate handling

📊 Performance Rating

• Build Performance: ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Good layer caching, could improve with .dockerignore)
• Runtime Performance: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent - static binary in scratch)
• Security: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Good foundations, certificate handling needs attention)

Overall Assessment

This is a solid multi-architecture Docker implementation that follows many best practices. The main concern is the CA certificate handling in the scratch environment, which could cause runtime issues with HTTPS requests. The multi-arch build approach is correctly implemented and should resolve the build failures mentioned in the PR title.

---