Skip to content

[Tracking] Define production-choice acceptance criteria #10

@Simonsbs

Description

@Simonsbs

Goal

Define objective ship criteria for “L0 as a desired language of choice for LLM workflows”.

Proposed criteria

  • LLM verify success >=85% and semantic success >=70% on benchmark corpus.
  • At least 3 diverse models pass minimum reliability bar.
  • Runtime geometric mean >=1.05x GCC on selected core kernels or clear documented tradeoff.
  • Full docs/wiki and benchmark dashboards stay green in CI for 14 consecutive days.

Acceptance

  • Criteria ratified in docs.
  • CI gates enforce thresholds.
  • Project board reflects pass/fail per criterion.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    area/benchmarkBenchmark methodology and automationarea/llm-usabilityLLM generation reliability and token efficiencyarea/perfCompiler/runtime performance workstreamspriority/highHigh prioritytype/trackingTracking/meta issue

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions