modify and separate JSON files for brown dwarf multiples.

[lesliech1004]

Should we separate and ingest Gl 337CD as Gl 337C, Gl 337D, AND Gl 337CD? In SIMBAD the two stars (Gl 337 C and Gl 337 D) are listed as the same star. The entry is for the combined light of the two sources.

https://simbad.cds.unistra.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=Gl+337+C&NbIdent=1&Radius=2&Radius.unit=arcmin&submit=submit+id

The same issue goes for Gl 447 CD
https://simbad.cds.unistra.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=Gl+417+B&NbIdent=1&Radius=2&Radius.unit=arcmin&submit=submit+id
and HD 130948BC
https://simbad.cds.unistra.fr/simbad/sim-id?Ident=HD+130948+B&NbIdent=1&Radius=2&Radius.unit=arcmin&submit=submit+id

[kelle]

I think this depends on what data exists for the sources. Eg, do we have any data for C and D like resolved spectroscopy or photometry?

[kelle]

We discussed this with a couple people and decided yes, to ingest the "unresolved" sources. We'll call them "unresolved parent" and the components will be "resolved child". This is being implemented in #631 .