Skip to content

Support for nanobind #323

@lczech

Description

@lczech

Hey Sergey,

after playing around with bindings for a week now (again... never ending topic for me it seems), I discovered that nanobind is a thing now - by the same original author of pybind, and apparently the new go-to way for bindings. Of course, I was a bit skeptical if that was actually necessary, but their arguments seem convincing.

Given that the way that nanobind and pybind work are almost completely identical, I was wondering if you are considering adding support for it. I know you are rather busy, and I also won't have much time to prepare this as a PR (but I could try at some point if you deem it possible), so this is a big ask, but if you think this could be done, that might be an amazing update of Binder!

All the best, and looking forward to hearing your thoughts
Lucas

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions