Why is unifuzz64.dll no longer needed. #9
Answered
by
ricko2001
Github-Pat-T
asked this question in
Q&A
-
|
In comparing the 1.2.1 and 1.5.0 code, I don't see why unifuzz64.dll is no longer needed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
ricko2001
Jan 12, 2024
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Yes and no. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
ricko2001
-
|
Thanks.
Get BlueMail for Android
…On Jan 11, 2024, 5:40 PM, at 5:40 PM, Richard J Otter ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes and no.
The only relevant changes are in a couple of the SQL select commands. I
just added a nocase clause in the order by and it worked.
I'm getting the same results as before, but probably not using the
rmnocase collated index.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#9 (comment)
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Yes and no.
The only relevant changes are in a couple of the SQL select commands. I just added a COLLATE NOCASE clause in the order by and it worked.
I'm getting the same results as before, but probably not using the rmnocase collated index.