from Collab22 session:
a couple comments from the Barry/David group that it's a bit distracting to start this section with an aside about sync v. async code review.
(or at least, I heard the comments that way because I also found this a bit disorienting on my read through)
Consider:
- re-frame "code review is a process with sync + aysnc components"
- move to the end
- remove completely -- because this particular section focuses on a face-to-face component of our process designed specifically for researchers; could say at end something like "future reviews between this author and reviewer may move to a combination of sync/async as both become familiar with the research question + and related code"
e.g. from @lucydot (tagging people so we can hopefully give credit later)
At the beginning of the section re-frame as “code review can be split into two types: synchronous and asynchronous….” and then the box about asynchronous review (or move this box to the end of the section?).