Skip to content

reordering lines on a large scale #156

@lcerrato

Description

@lcerrato

Considering that CTS labels are not inherently meaningful, renumbering a work is not problematic.

I'm curious as to whether we want to delete the old numbering data. It seems to me that someone working with a text may find the traditional print derived numbers useful as place holders and if commenting these out is not problematic, wouldn't we want to keep them, especially in a case where the renumbering radically departs from the traditional format.

When working in an xml file sometimes the number is best way to navigate, particularly if there are variants that are going to trip up a content search.

I fully understand we should be moving past this — but I don't think we are there yet speaking as an editor. I'm willing to be persuaded that I'm missing something here.

An example found in Claudian: /stoa0089/stoa004/stoa0089.stoa004.perseus-lat2.xml
compare at

PerseusDL/canonical-latinLit@3c04319#diff-da145cc17ad6bbda37d1c9c1dbece809

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions