Replies: 5 comments
-
|
Hmm- we did some benchmarks on Nequip / MACE-style configs and for inference we outperform, training we are competitive against FlashTP. Worth noting: their paper compares against an older version of CuEq. CuEq is now much more competitive for higher irreps (see our roofline plot in the paper, where we go up to L=7. Can you define "higher angular momentum"? Some sample input representations would be helpful. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
by higher angular momentum I meant l>2 from the table 2 in the paper. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Sure - we can add to our radar to extract / benchmark some of those configs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Let's convert this to a discussion now that the main issue has been answered. Can follow up there if needed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.


Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
FlashTP seems to outperform CuEq by a lot for higher angular momentum ops. They sadly do not benchmark against OEq this is just a general inquiry as to whether this is on the mantainers radar.
https://openreview.net/pdf?id=wiQe95BPaB
https://github.com/SNU-ARC/flashTP?tab=readme-ov-file
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions