Provenance data inconsistent with Turbot

[JeniT]

The documentation in the README says to use processingScript. The documentation on the website says to use processing_scripts and processing_script. Which is correct or are they all acceptable?

[JeniT]

and the Turbot documentation says something similar to the Ernest website so there's inconsistency there too, hence the title of the issue as that's where I spotted it first

[Floppy]

My mistake, it should be processing_script. See https://github.com/OpenAddressesUK/ernest/blob/master/lib/jobs/create_address.rb#L45

[Floppy]

I think I got all javascripty. I should change userInput to user_input for consistency as well.

[JeniT]

I fixed the README, but there's still inconsistency. See the search for processing_scripts. Or do these mean different things?

[Floppy]

mmm, I'll have to check this when I can concentrate properly. /cc @pezholio

[pezholio]

Ah, I think processing_scripts here refers to a repo, whereas processing_script refers to a particular file and ref