guess who #741

Graison-P · 2026-01-20T18:01:14Z

Graison-P
Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator

it's me, BLEEP
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/861974/

(this is semi important for qfb in a way because it's on there)

2026-01-20T18:01:48Z

traycerai[bot]
bot Jan 20, 2026

Plan

Observations

The qcode addon in file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js is a placeholder addon with incomplete implementation. The manifest comment states "by supervoidcoder and NotTheBaton and NOT CENTLEY CELL" but only credits NotTheBaton. The description mentions "centley cell" and the addon files (file:src/addons/addons/qcode/userscript.js and file:src/addons/addons/qcode/style.css) are essentially empty placeholders. The issue title "guess who" with censored name refers to properly crediting "Centley Cell" for their contribution.

Approach

The issue is requesting proper attribution for contributors to the qcode addon. Based on the manifest comment and description, three people contributed: supervoidcoder, NotTheBaton, and Centley Cell. The solution involves updating the credits array in the manifest to include all contributors who worked on the addon, following the same pattern used in other addons like file:src/addons/addons/debugger/_manifest_entry.js which lists multiple contributors.

Implementation Steps

1. Update qcode Addon Credits

Modify file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js:

Update the credits array to include all three contributors mentioned in the comment
Add entries for "supervoidcoder", "NotTheBaton", and "Centley Cell" following the pattern from other addons
Each credit entry should have a name field at minimum
Optionally add link fields if Scratch profile URLs are available (following the pattern in debugger addon)
Update the comment to reflect accurate attribution, removing the "NOT" prefix

2. Update Addon Description

In the same manifest file:

Update the description from "aura farming addon + balkan rage + centley cell" to a proper description of the addon's actual purpose
Ensure the description follows the pattern of other addons (clear, concise explanation of functionality)

3. Verify Addon Registration

The qcode addon is already registered in:

file:src/addons/addons.js - the addon is listed in the addons array
The addon is properly configured with userscripts and userstyles

4. Documentation Update

If there's any documentation about contributors or the qcode addon:

Update any README or CONTRIBUTING files that might reference this addon
Ensure the credits align across all documentation

Expected Credits Structure

"credits": [
  {
    "name": "supervoidcoder"
  },
  {
    "name": "NotTheBaton"
  },
  {
    "name": "Centley Cell"
  }
]

This follows the same pattern as the debugger addon which lists multiple contributors, ensuring proper attribution for all who contributed to the qcode addon development.

Import In IDE

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

## Observations

The qcode addon in `file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js` is a placeholder addon with incomplete implementation. The manifest comment states "by supervoidcoder and NotTheBaton and NOT CENTLEY CELL" but only credits NotTheBaton. The description mentions "centley cell" and the addon files (`file:src/addons/addons/qcode/userscript.js` and `file:src/addons/addons/qcode/style.css`) are essentially empty placeholders. The issue title "guess who" with censored name refers to properly crediting "Centley Cell" for their contribution.

## Approach

The issue is requesting proper attribution for contributors to the qcode addon. Based on the manifest comment and description, three people contributed: supervoidcoder, NotTheBaton, and Centley Cell. The solution involves updating the credits array in the manifest to include all contributors who worked on the addon, following the same pattern used in other addons like `file:src/addons/addons/debugger/_manifest_entry.js` which lists multiple contributors.

## Implementation Steps

### 1. Update qcode Addon Credits

Modify `file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js`:

- Update the `credits` array to include all three contributors mentioned in the comment
- Add entries for "supervoidcoder", "NotTheBaton", and "Centley Cell" following the pattern from other addons
- Each credit entry should have a `name` field at minimum
- Optionally add `link` fields if Scratch profile URLs are available (following the pattern in debugger addon)
- Update the comment to reflect accurate attribution, removing the "NOT" prefix

### 2. Update Addon Description

In the same manifest file:

- Update the description from "aura farming addon + balkan rage + centley cell" to a proper description of the addon's actual purpose
- Ensure the description follows the pattern of other addons (clear, concise explanation of functionality)

### 3. Verify Addon Registration

The qcode addon is already registered in:

- `file:src/addons/addons.js` - the addon is listed in the addons array
- The addon is properly configured with userscripts and userstyles

### 4. Documentation Update

If there's any documentation about contributors or the qcode addon:

- Update any README or CONTRIBUTING files that might reference this addon
- Ensure the credits align across all documentation

## Expected Credits Structure

```javascript
"credits": [
  {
    "name": "supervoidcoder"
  },
  {
    "name": "NotTheBaton"
  },
  {
    "name": "Centley Cell"
  }
]
```

This follows the same pattern as the debugger addon which lists multiple contributors, ensuring proper attribution for all who contributed to the qcode addon development.

Execution Information

Branch: main
Commit: f24226e

💡 Tips

Supported Commands (Inside Comments)

Use @traycerai generate to iterate on the previous version of the implementation plan.

Supported Commands (Inside Description)

Add @traycerai ignore anywhere in the ticket description to prevent this ticket from being processed.
Add @traycerai branch:<branch-name> anywhere in the ticket description to specify the target branch for the implementation plan.

Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

0 replies

2026-01-20T18:02:36Z

github-actions[bot]
bot Jan 20, 2026

🤖 Issue Closed

Hi @IM NOT TRAYCERAI! It looks like this issue isn't related to OmniBlocks, but rather links to an unrelated Scratch Discussion Forum topic. If this is a general question or discussion, feel free to move it over to the Discussions tab (https://github.com/orgs/OmniBlocks/discussions) where it's more appropriate.

If there's something specific you'd like help with regarding OmniBlocks, feel free to clarify here! For now, I'll close this as it's not a valid issue.

no - graison

0 replies

Graison-P · 2026-01-20T18:30:23Z

Graison-P
Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator Author

@supervoidcoder @8to16

0 replies

2026-01-20T18:32:23Z

traycerai[bot]
bot Jan 20, 2026

I have updated the Implementation Plan to reflect the recent changes in the ticket.

Previous Plan

Observations

The qcode addon in file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js is a placeholder addon with incomplete implementation. The manifest comment states "by supervoidcoder and NotTheBaton and NOT CENTLEY CELL" but only credits NotTheBaton. The description mentions "centley cell" and the addon files (file:src/addons/addons/qcode/userscript.js and file:src/addons/addons/qcode/style.css) are essentially empty placeholders. The issue title "guess who" with censored name likely refers to properly crediting "Centley Cell" for their contribution.

Approach

The issue is requesting proper attribution for contributors to the qcode addon. Based on the manifest comment and description, three people appear to have contributed: supervoidcoder, NotTheBaton, and Centley Cell. The solution involves updating the credits array in the manifest to include all contributors who worked on the addon, following the same pattern used in other addons like file:src/addons/addons/debugger/_manifest_entry.js which lists multiple contributors.

Implementation Steps

1. Update qcode Addon Credits

Modify file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js:

Update the credits array to include all three contributors mentioned in the comment

Add entries for "supervoidcoder", "NotTheBaton", and "Centley Cell" following the pattern from other addons

Each credit entry should have a name field at minimum

Optionally add link fields if Scratch profile URLs are available (following the pattern in debugger addon)

Remove or update the comment "NOT CENTLEY CELL" to reflect accurate attribution

2. Update Addon Description

In the same manifest file:

Consider updating the description from "aura farming addon + balkan rage + centley cell" to something more descriptive of the addon's actual purpose

If this is placeholder text, replace it with a proper description once the addon functionality is implemented

Ensure the description follows the pattern of other addons (clear, concise explanation of functionality)

3. Verify Addon Registration

Check that the qcode addon is properly registered in:

file:src/addons/generated/addon-entries.js - ensure the addon is included in the generated entries

file:src/addons/generated/addon-manifests.js - verify the manifest is properly exported

file:src/addons/addons.js - confirm the addon is listed if manually registered

4. Documentation Update

If there's any documentation about contributors or the qcode addon:

Update any README or CONTRIBUTING files that might reference this addon

Ensure the credits align across all documentation

Expected Credits Structure
"credits": [
  {
    "name": "supervoidcoder"
  },
  {
    "name": "NotTheBaton"
  },
  {
    "name": "Centley Cell"
  }
]
This follows the same pattern as the debugger addon which lists multiple contributors, ensuring proper attribution for all who contributed to the qcode addon development.

Import In IDE
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
## Observations

The qcode addon in `file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js` is a placeholder addon with incomplete implementation. The manifest comment states "by supervoidcoder and NotTheBaton and NOT CENTLEY CELL" but only credits NotTheBaton. The description mentions "centley cell" and the addon files (`file:src/addons/addons/qcode/userscript.js` and `file:src/addons/addons/qcode/style.css`) are essentially empty placeholders. The issue title "guess who" with censored name likely refers to properly crediting "Centley Cell" for their contribution.

## Approach

The issue is requesting proper attribution for contributors to the qcode addon. Based on the manifest comment and description, three people appear to have contributed: supervoidcoder, NotTheBaton, and Centley Cell. The solution involves updating the credits array in the manifest to include all contributors who worked on the addon, following the same pattern used in other addons like `file:src/addons/addons/debugger/_manifest_entry.js` which lists multiple contributors.

## Implementation Steps

### 1. Update qcode Addon Credits

Modify `file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js`:

- Update the `credits` array to include all three contributors mentioned in the comment
- Add entries for "supervoidcoder", "NotTheBaton", and "Centley Cell" following the pattern from other addons
- Each credit entry should have a `name` field at minimum
- Optionally add `link` fields if Scratch profile URLs are available (following the pattern in debugger addon)
- Remove or update the comment "NOT CENTLEY CELL" to reflect accurate attribution

### 2. Update Addon Description

In the same manifest file:

- Consider updating the description from "aura farming addon + balkan rage + centley cell" to something more descriptive of the addon's actual purpose
- If this is placeholder text, replace it with a proper description once the addon functionality is implemented
- Ensure the description follows the pattern of other addons (clear, concise explanation of functionality)

### 3. Verify Addon Registration

Check that the qcode addon is properly registered in:

- `file:src/addons/generated/addon-entries.js` - ensure the addon is included in the generated entries
- `file:src/addons/generated/addon-manifests.js` - verify the manifest is properly exported
- `file:src/addons/addons.js` - confirm the addon is listed if manually registered

### 4. Documentation Update

If there's any documentation about contributors or the qcode addon:

- Update any README or CONTRIBUTING files that might reference this addon
- Ensure the credits align across all documentation

## Expected Credits Structure

```javascript
"credits": [
  {
    "name": "supervoidcoder"
  },
  {
    "name": "NotTheBaton"
  },
  {
    "name": "Centley Cell"
  }
]
```

This follows the same pattern as the debugger addon which lists multiple contributors, ensuring proper attribution for all who contributed to the qcode addon development.
Execution Information

Branch: main
Commit: f24226e
New Plan

Observations

The qcode addon in file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js is a placeholder addon with incomplete implementation. The manifest comment states "by supervoidcoder and NotTheBaton and NOT CENTLEY CELL" but only credits NotTheBaton. The description mentions "centley cell" and the addon files (file:src/addons/addons/qcode/userscript.js and file:src/addons/addons/qcode/style.css) are essentially empty placeholders. The issue title "guess who" with censored name refers to properly crediting "Centley Cell" for their contribution.

Approach

The issue is requesting proper attribution for contributors to the qcode addon. Based on the manifest comment and description, three people contributed: supervoidcoder, NotTheBaton, and Centley Cell. The solution involves updating the credits array in the manifest to include all contributors who worked on the addon, following the same pattern used in other addons like file:src/addons/addons/debugger/_manifest_entry.js which lists multiple contributors.

Implementation Steps

1. Update qcode Addon Credits

Modify file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js:

Update the credits array to include all three contributors mentioned in the comment

Add entries for "supervoidcoder", "NotTheBaton", and "Centley Cell" following the pattern from other addons

Each credit entry should have a name field at minimum

Optionally add link fields if Scratch profile URLs are available (following the pattern in debugger addon)

Update the comment to reflect accurate attribution, removing the "NOT" prefix

2. Update Addon Description

In the same manifest file:

Update the description from "aura farming addon + balkan rage + centley cell" to a proper description of the addon's actual purpose

Ensure the description follows the pattern of other addons (clear, concise explanation of functionality)

3. Verify Addon Registration

The qcode addon is already registered in:

file:src/addons/addons.js - the addon is listed in the addons array

The addon is properly configured with userscripts and userstyles

4. Documentation Update

If there's any documentation about contributors or the qcode addon:

Update any README or CONTRIBUTING files that might reference this addon

Ensure the credits align across all documentation

Expected Credits Structure
"credits": [
  {
    "name": "supervoidcoder"
  },
  {
    "name": "NotTheBaton"
  },
  {
    "name": "Centley Cell"
  }
]
This follows the same pattern as the debugger addon which lists multiple contributors, ensuring proper attribution for all who contributed to the qcode addon development.

Import In IDE
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
## Observations

The qcode addon in `file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js` is a placeholder addon with incomplete implementation. The manifest comment states "by supervoidcoder and NotTheBaton and NOT CENTLEY CELL" but only credits NotTheBaton. The description mentions "centley cell" and the addon files (`file:src/addons/addons/qcode/userscript.js` and `file:src/addons/addons/qcode/style.css`) are essentially empty placeholders. The issue title "guess who" with censored name refers to properly crediting "Centley Cell" for their contribution.

## Approach

The issue is requesting proper attribution for contributors to the qcode addon. Based on the manifest comment and description, three people contributed: supervoidcoder, NotTheBaton, and Centley Cell. The solution involves updating the credits array in the manifest to include all contributors who worked on the addon, following the same pattern used in other addons like `file:src/addons/addons/debugger/_manifest_entry.js` which lists multiple contributors.

## Implementation Steps

### 1. Update qcode Addon Credits

Modify `file:src/addons/addons/qcode/_manifest_entry.js`:

- Update the `credits` array to include all three contributors mentioned in the comment
- Add entries for "supervoidcoder", "NotTheBaton", and "Centley Cell" following the pattern from other addons
- Each credit entry should have a `name` field at minimum
- Optionally add `link` fields if Scratch profile URLs are available (following the pattern in debugger addon)
- Update the comment to reflect accurate attribution, removing the "NOT" prefix

### 2. Update Addon Description

In the same manifest file:

- Update the description from "aura farming addon + balkan rage + centley cell" to a proper description of the addon's actual purpose
- Ensure the description follows the pattern of other addons (clear, concise explanation of functionality)

### 3. Verify Addon Registration

The qcode addon is already registered in:

- `file:src/addons/addons.js` - the addon is listed in the addons array
- The addon is properly configured with userscripts and userstyles

### 4. Documentation Update

If there's any documentation about contributors or the qcode addon:

- Update any README or CONTRIBUTING files that might reference this addon
- Ensure the credits align across all documentation

## Expected Credits Structure

```javascript
"credits": [
  {
    "name": "supervoidcoder"
  },
  {
    "name": "NotTheBaton"
  },
  {
    "name": "Centley Cell"
  }
]
```

This follows the same pattern as the debugger addon which lists multiple contributors, ensuring proper attribution for all who contributed to the qcode addon development.
Execution Information

Branch: main
Commit: f24226e

0 replies

supervoidcoder · 2026-01-20T19:10:32Z

supervoidcoder
Jan 20, 2026
Maintainer

quack

cwanker

clanker

0 replies

Graison-P · 2026-01-20T19:13:21Z

Graison-P
Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator Author

quack

cwanker

clanker

psst...
click dis:
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/861974/

7 replies

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026
Maintainer

OMG YOU GOT STICKIED?!?!?!!?

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026
Maintainer

YOU MADE A DIRECTORY TOPCI1?!?!?!?!?

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026
Maintainer

this is genuinely crazy dude, congrats

Graison-P Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator Author

this is genuinely crazy dude, congrats

THIS IS A MOMENT IN HISTORY
~~TAKE A PICTURE!!!!!!!11111~~ oh wait I already did that

Graison-P Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator Author

@supervoidcoder PADDLE MENTIONED ME

OmniBlocks

guess who #741

Uh oh!

Graison-P Jan 20, 2026 Collaborator

Replies: 6 comments · 7 replies

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

traycerai[bot] bot Jan 20, 2026

Plan

Observations

Approach

Implementation Steps

1. Update qcode Addon Credits

2. Update Addon Description

3. Verify Addon Registration

4. Documentation Update

Expected Credits Structure

Import In IDE

Supported Commands (Inside Comments)

Supported Commands (Inside Description)

Community

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions[bot] bot Jan 20, 2026

Uh oh!

Graison-P Jan 20, 2026 Collaborator Author

Uh oh!

traycerai[bot] bot Jan 20, 2026

Observations

Approach

Implementation Steps

1. Update qcode Addon Credits

2. Update Addon Description

3. Verify Addon Registration

4. Documentation Update

Expected Credits Structure

Import In IDE

Observations

Approach

Implementation Steps

1. Update qcode Addon Credits

2. Update Addon Description

3. Verify Addon Registration

4. Documentation Update

Expected Credits Structure

Import In IDE

Uh oh!

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026 Maintainer

Uh oh!

Graison-P Jan 20, 2026 Collaborator Author

Uh oh!

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026 Maintainer

Uh oh!

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026 Maintainer

Uh oh!

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026 Maintainer

Uh oh!

Graison-P Jan 20, 2026 Collaborator Author

Uh oh!

Graison-P Jan 20, 2026 Collaborator Author

Graison-P
Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator

Replies: 6 comments 7 replies

traycerai[bot]
bot Jan 20, 2026

github-actions[bot]
bot Jan 20, 2026

Graison-P
Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator Author

traycerai[bot]
bot Jan 20, 2026

supervoidcoder
Jan 20, 2026
Maintainer

Graison-P
Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator Author

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026
Maintainer

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026
Maintainer

supervoidcoder Jan 20, 2026
Maintainer

Graison-P Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator Author

Graison-P Jan 20, 2026
Collaborator Author