Fair tutorial guidelines

docs/commons/fair/fair-commons.rst

@@ -20,4 +20,5 @@ The following resources in this section are part of the FAIR Commons component.
     Catalogue of Tests <catalogue-of-tests>
     Catalogue of Benchmark Scoring Algorithms <catalogue-of-benchmark-scoring-algorithms>
     Code of Shared Tests <shared-tests>
+    Tutorials <tutorials/tutorial-index>
 

docs/commons/fair/tutorials/create-benchmark.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
+.. _tutorial_create_fair_benchmark:
+
+Creating a FAIR Benchmark and Metrics
+=====================================
+
+This tutorial explains how to create a **community FAIR Benchmark** and
+any additional **Metrics** using the OSTrails FAIR Assessment framework.
+
+You will start from the *OSTrails FAIR Assessment – Conceptual Requirements*
+template and work through it to produce a **Benchmark narrative** describing
+how your community interprets the FAIR Principles for a specific type of
+digital object.
+
+By the end of this tutorial you will have:
+
+* a completed **community FAIR Benchmark narrative**
+* a defined set of **FAIR Metrics**
+* any required **community-specific specialised Metrics**
+
+For an overview of the process, see :ref:`benchmark_workflow`.
+
+.. _benchmark_prerequisites:
+
+Prerequisites
+-------------
+
+Before starting you should:
+
+* Download the
+  `OSTrails FAIR Assessment – Conceptual Requirements template
+  <https://zenodo.org/records/18488022>`_.
+* Be familiar with the **FAIR Principles**.
+* Identify the **community or discipline** for which the Benchmark will apply.
+
+.. _benchmark_workflow:
+
+Workflow overview
+-----------------
+
+Creating a FAIR Benchmark typically involves the following steps:
+
+1. :ref:`copy_template`
+2. :ref:`define_benchmark`
+3. :ref:`review_generic_metrics`
+4. :ref:`define_specialised_metrics`
+5. :ref:`review_benchmark`
+6. :ref:`register_benchmark`
+
+Each step is described in the sections below.
+
+.. _copy_template:
+
+Step 1 – Copy the OSTrails template
+-----------------------------------
+
+Begin by making a working copy of the **OSTrails FAIR Assessment –
+Conceptual Requirements template**.
+
+The template provides a structured format for describing:
+
+* the **scope of the Benchmark**
+* the **digital objects being assessed**
+* the **Metrics used to evaluate FAIRness**
+* the **community standards and practices** that apply
+
+Once the template has been downloaded and renamed, you should
+work through your Benchmark narrative document sequentially,
+completing each section with information relevant to your community.
+
+Proceed to
+:ref:`define_benchmark`.
+
+.. _define_benchmark:
+
+Step 2 – Define the community Benchmark
+---------------------------------------
+
+The **Benchmark** section provides the narrative description of how
+FAIR is interpreted for your community.
+
+Complete the Benchmark description by specifying:
+
+**Benchmark name**
+
+  A short, descriptive title for the Benchmark.
+
+**Description**
+
+  A concise explanation of the purpose of the Benchmark and the
+  community it serves.
+
+**Applicability**
+
+  Define clearly:
+
+  * the **type of digital object** being assessed
+    (for example datasets, workflows, software, or metadata records)
+  * the **disciplinary scope** of the Benchmark
+
+**Related resources**
+
+  List any standards, repositories, policies, or vocabularies that
+  support FAIR practice in your community.
+
+The goal of this section is to describe **what FAIR means in practice
+for the community and its digital objects**.
+
+Next, review the Metrics available in your Benchmark narrative as described in
+:ref:`review_generic_metrics`.
+
+.. _review_generic_metrics:
+
+Step 3 – Review the generic FAIR Metrics
+----------------------------------------
+
+Your Benchmark narrative includes **generic Metrics** aligned with the
+FAIR Principles. These are designed to be broadly applicable across many
+disciplines.
+
+For each Metric card in your Benchmark narrative:
+
+1. Read the description of the Metric.
+2. Decide whether it satisfies your community requirements.
+3. Select the appropriate option in your Benchmark narrative:
+
+   * ``This generic Metric is sufficient for our needs``
+   * ``This generic Metric is not sufficient for our needs``
+   * ``This principle is not applicable to our definition of FAIR``
+
+Generic Metrics commonly address topics such as:
+
+* persistent identifiers
+* structured metadata
+* links between data and metadata
+* indexing for discovery
+* open and standardised access protocols
+
+In many cases these generic Metrics can be adopted without modification.
+
+If a generic Metric does not fully capture community practice, define a
+specialised Metric as described in
+:ref:`define_specialised_metrics`.
+
+.. _define_specialised_metrics:
+
+Step 4 – Define specialised Metrics where required
+--------------------------------------------------
+
+Some FAIR principles require **community-specific interpretation**.
+Where the generic Metric does not adequately represent community
+practice, define a **specialised Metric**.
+
+Specialised Metrics are commonly required for principles such as:
+
+* **I2 – Use of FAIR vocabularies**
+* **R1.2 – Provenance**
+* **R1.3 – Community standards**
+
+When defining a specialised Metric, include the following elements.
+
+**Metric name**
+
+  A short descriptive title.
+
+**Metric description**
+
+  A clear explanation of what is being evaluated and why it supports
+  FAIR.
+
+**Assessment criteria**
+
+  The conditions that must be met for the Metric to pass.
+
+**Related standards or resources**
+
+  References to relevant community standards, vocabularies, or
+  policies.
+
+**Examples**
+
+  Where possible, provide:
+
+  * a positive example
+  * a negative example
+  * an indeterminate example
+
+These examples help both implementers and assessment tools understand
+how the Metric should be applied.
+
+Once specialised Metrics have been defined, review the Benchmark as
+described in :ref:`review_benchmark`.
+
+.. _review_benchmark:
+
+Step 5 – Review the completed Benchmark
+---------------------------------------
+
+After completing all sections of your Benchmark narrative:
+
+* Review the Benchmark with **community experts or stakeholders**.
+* Check that **all relevant FAIR principles are addressed**.
+* Ensure that any referenced **standards, vocabularies, or
+  repositories** are clearly identified.
+
+The completed document now represents the **conceptual FAIR Benchmark**
+for your community.
+
+The final step is to register the Benchmark and Metrics as described in
+:ref:`register_benchmark`.
+
+.. _register_benchmark:
+
+Step 6 – Register the Benchmark and Metrics
+-------------------------------------------
+
+To enable reuse and interoperability, the Benchmark and its Metrics
+should be registered in community registries such as
+`FAIRsharing <https://fairsharing.org>`_.
+
+Registration should include:
+
+* the **Benchmark description**
+* each **specialised Metric**
+* references to any **standards, databases, or vocabularies**
+
+Registering these components allows:
+
+* FAIR assessment tools to discover and implement the Metrics
+* other communities to reuse or adapt the Benchmark
+* FAIR assessment results to be compared across tools
+
+Next steps
+----------
+
+Once the conceptual Benchmark has been created, the next stages
+typically include:
+
+* implementing **machine-actionable Metric tests**
+* defining **assessment workflows**
+* applying the Benchmark to **evaluate digital objects**
+
+This converts the conceptual definition into a working
+**FAIR assessment framework**.
+
+Continue with the tutorial:
+
+:ref:`tutorial_create_metric_tests`
+

docs/commons/fair/tutorials/create-metric.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+How to create a metric
+======================

docs/commons/fair/tutorials/create-test-following-ftr.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+.. _tutorial_create_metric_tests:
+
+How to create a test (service) following the FTR API
+====================================================
+
+Benchmark Assessment Algorithms rely on **FAIR Metric Tests**.
+
+Each test evaluates a specific FAIR requirement and returns a result of:
+
+* ``pass``
+* ``fail``
+* ``indeterminate``
+
+A test has three main components.
+
+**DCAT description**
+
+  A machine-readable metadata record describing the test.
+
+**API definition**
+
+  An OpenAPI specification describing how to call the test service.
+
+**Test implementation**
+
+  The executable service that performs the assessment.
+
+Tests can be written in any programming language provided they:
+
+* accept the **GUID of a digital object** as input
+* return a **JSON result object** containing the outcome
+
+.. _creating_metric_test:
+
+Creating a new FAIR Metric Test
+-------------------------------
+
+New tests can be registered using **FAIR Wizard**.
+
+1. Open FAIR Wizard and create a **new project**.
+2. Select a knowledge model.
+3. Enable **Filter by question tags**.
+4. Choose **Test** as the artefact type.
+
+Two key fields must be completed.
+
+**Endpoint URL**
+
+  The service endpoint that executes the test.
+
+**Endpoint URL Description**
+
+  The location of the **OpenAPI description** of the test API.
+
+Once the questionnaire has been completed, create and submit the
+resulting document.
+
+After processing, the test record is deposited in the
+**OSTrails Assessment Component Metadata Records repository** and
+indexed by FAIR Data Point.
+
+The test will then appear in the **FAIR Champion Test Registry** and
+can be referenced in your Benchmark Configuration Spreadsheet.
+
+Next steps
+----------
+
+Once your Benchmark Assessment Algorithm and tests are defined you can:
+
+* integrate additional **FAIR Metric Tests**
+* refine scoring conditions and weights
+* run assessments across larger collections of digital objects
+
+This enables automated **community FAIR Benchmark assessments** using
+the OSTrails FAIR Champion tool.
+
+Continue with the tutorial:
+
+:ref:`tutorial_fair_benchmark_algorithm`

docs/commons/fair/tutorials/define-benchmark-associated-metrics.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+How define my Benchmark and its associated specialised Metrics
+==================================================================