Comparison to NixVim

[axelkar]

Could you add a comparison of NVF to NixVim to the README?

Here's what I think (correct me; I haven't used NVF):

NVF is more opinionated/integrated than NixVim, and because of that users don't have to configure plugins as much to work with each other. Examples of the categories/integrations include vim.languages and vim.autocomplete.

NVF also uses a DAG for configuration, compared to numbered ordering in NixVim. Similar to home-manager vs NixOS.

[NotAShelf]

I'm not very keen on adding a comparison, because

1. I do not plan to add an advertise a project, by extension, that I do not contribute to nor wish to encourage
2. I do not use nixvim, and I've never used nixvim. Any comparisons I make would be unfair, if not ill-guided.
3. nvf is not designed as a "nixvim alterative", it is a separate project that simply co-exists in the Nix/OS space.

That said, I believe your comparison is quite apt. nvf aims to be more integrated, more comfortable and more importantly more extensible than the rest of the wrappers. In this sense it is a hybrid wrapper that allows Nix and Lua almost interchangeably. We also make good use of DAGs, which as you put it, is one of the differences.