Installation note & PyTorch

[RedenticDev]

Hi there,
Out of curiosity, I installed it on my MacBook Pro M1 Pro (Ventura latest). The installation itself worked well, however, I have 2 suggestions and a subsequent issue:

• Suggestion 1: this is a new, not-quite-known-yet project. Some people would be interested to know what the installation script they run on their machine actually does, especially when it's not a simple installation like a pip install luz or a brew install luz. So it might be good to print steps like Installing ldid and xz or Downloading SDKs from https://... in my opinion, or at least provide a --verbose flag.
• Suggestion 2: add an easier update mechanism (it's probably on your list already), because opening again the docs, picking the right long command, and don't forget to run it with the --update flag is not easy I guess: maybe a luz upgrade could do the trick?
• Issue after installation: I noticed by running a pip-review -a after luz is installed that it causes an issue in my pip installation:

Exception: You tried to install "pytorch". The package named for PyTorch is "torch"

Removing luz with pip uninstall luz fixed it, so I assume you might have misspelled the dependency in a requirements.txt somewhere even if I couldn't find it anywhere. Can you please fix that?

Thanks for working on this promising project by the way!

[ja1dan]

Luz actually isn't on PyPi yet. The reason why you got this pytorch error was because the Luz that is on PyPi has pytorch listed as a dependency (probably should've checked PyPi before I picked a name, haha). If you'd like to install Luz without the use of the script, you can run "pip install git+https://github.com/LuzProject/luz". I see your suggestions and i'll make sure to take them into account - all the installation script does is installs Luz's dependencies (ldid xz, and clang) and then makes the directory ~/.luz and clones sdks to ~/.luz/sdks - I'll add logs for these soon.

[RedenticDev]

Ok, so it means that if I keep Luz I'm gonna have to find a way to ignore luz while using pip-review, which does not seem possible, because of a name conflict... Sad but got it.
Anyway, thanks for your feedback, can't wait to see these changes live and to (try to) use Luz if I get back to tweaks someday :)