Consider adding Bag-Software-Agent to bag info well-known field list

[acdha]

According to https://github.com/search?q=bag-software-agent&type=Code there are Python, Ruby, Java, Scala, and Bash implementations of bagit which all set Bag-Software-Agent in bag-info.txt. Should we add that to the well-known field list in the spec?

cc: @dbrunton @johnscancella @justinlittman @jkunze

[johnscancella]

I think that is something we should add to the bagit.txt for bagit 2.0

[justinlittman]

Concur.

…

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:46 AM John Scancella ***@***.***> wrote: I think that is something we should add to the bagit.txt for bagit 2.0 — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#33 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAj6L5RfsSN8c3BnE2xqsRBn4BFEKovSks5t8O1mgaJpZM4UlJuF> .

[jkunze]

+1 On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 3:47 AM, Justin Littman <notifications@github.com> wrote:

…

Concur. On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:46 AM John Scancella ***@***.***> wrote: > I think that is something we should add to the bagit.txt for bagit 2.0 > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#33 (comment)- 396895084>, > or mute the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ AAj6L5RfsSN8c3BnE2xqsRBn4BFEKovSks5t8O1mgaJpZM4UlJuF> > . > — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#33 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGaPA7QzYHgBUWPMD667ciQypwxZE5qks5t8O2qgaJpZM4UlJuF> .

[acdha]

I was going to create a 2.0 (post 1.0?) milestone for this issue but that immediately raises the question of which repo is canonical. I'm wondering whether we should consider setting up a GitHub organization to hold bagit-related projects.