General Working Group Score page improvements #27
Description
Suggestions to improve the page Working Group Score from Marketing WG
Introduction
The header "Introduction" is missing, it is the plain text.
It is necessary to add a brief description in the first sentence for each type of general score. So that it becomes immediately clear what is being discussed. Further in the text, a detailed description of the assessment is given.
Bounty Score
There is not enough information about the bounty score:
- It should be clarified that each Working group should provide a bounty every period for newcomers.
- Necessary to add whether it is necessary to provide a bounty if there are no applicants for the role of a newcomer.
- Should bounties change every period or can they be repeated?
- Can the Leads of one working group make up bounties for other working groups?
Opening Score
Add that there should be an open vacancy for each position that is available in the working group.
Score
there is no description of the indicators in the calculation formula: 5*2^{N+M}
What is M?
What does it mean 2.
Catastrophic Errors
The Catastrophic Errors should also include the late submission of the WG report. The information contained in the WG report is necessary for writing a Council’s Summary.
For the Late summary and Late plan, it should be added that the summary and plan should be posted on the forum
No openings
It should be clarified that the opening should be open to all vacancies that currently exist in the Working group.