You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2022. It is now read-only.
It would be good to add a page somewhere with a list of performance tips for ITensor/tensor network contraction methods.
One example is a performance issue I was just running into, where I was contracting two MPS psi and phi like this:
auto N = 10;
auto sites = SiteSet(N,2);
auto psi = MPS(sites);
auto phi = MPS(sites);
auto O = psi(1)*phi(1);
for( auto n : range1(N) )
O *= psi(n) * phi(n);
and getting really bad performance (for medium to large bond dimensions). The definition of *= in ITensor leads to a different order of operations than I was expecting (performing psi(n)*phi(n) first, then contracting with O). So a better way is to write this as:
for( auto n : range1(N) )
{
O *= psi(n);
O *= phi(n);
}
I was used to the definition of x *= y from Julia, where it is always lowered to x = x * y, so it took longer than it should have for me to catch this. Anyway, just adding a note about this for future reference.