DL permits DIV as direct child since "HTML5" and adjacent DTs and DDs

[myfonj]

REVENGE.CSS/revenge.css

Line 62 in 1fdbe2c

dl > *:not(dt):not(dd),

Sure this style predates HTML5 and HTML Living Standard, so hard to criticize, but nowadays it is allowed to have non-nested DIV elements inside DL:

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/grouping-content.html#the-dl-element:concept-element-content-model

REVENGE.CSS/revenge.css

Line 63 in 1fdbe2c

dt + *:not(dd),

Also AFAIK it newer was a mistake to have multiple definitiondescription therms defscribed by one or more DD.

So such sample should suffer no revenge:

<dl>
  <div>
   <dt>foo</dt>
   <dt>bar</dt>
   <dt>baz</dt>
   <dd>Very common metasyntactic variables.</dd>
   <dd>Frowned-upon words without meaning often seen in programming handbooks.</dd>
  </div>
  <div>
    <dt>metasyntactic variable</dt>
    <dd><q cite="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metasyntactic_variable">specific word or set of words identified as a placeholder in computer science and specifically computer programming</q></dd>
  </div>
</dl>

[Heydon]

@myfonj Absolutely! You're right.

[Heydon]

@myfonj Just removed those rules