-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
Description
Context
Hi:
I am currently using defects4j and GZoltar together to evaluate the performance of fault localization. Therefore, I referred to the experiment setup in Evaluating and Improving Fault Localization Techniques.
Currently, I am facing the problem that additional test cases are failing when ran in isolation by GZoltar. I know that GZoltar is using JUnitCore to run those test cases. And I noticed that there have been previous issues on this problem, like D4J Issue 42. However, I haven't had a clear sense on how to solve the problem. Could you share with me how you tackled the problem in "Evaluating and Improving Fault Localization Techniques", since you were also using GZoltar.
Steps to Reproduce
Defects4j Lang; bug id 59.
Java version: 1.8.0_312
GZoltar version: 1.7.3-SNAPSHOT
JUnit Version: 3.8.1 (following the pom.xml in Lang59)
GZoltar arguments
I am following the original GZoltar command line file's arguments.
Expected behaviour
For Lang 59, there are these tests failing additionally:
org.apache.commons.lang.EntitiesPerformanceTest#testUnescapeArray has finished! Has it failed? true
org.apache.commons.lang.EntitiesPerformanceTest#testEscapeArray has finished! Has it failed? true
org.apache.commons.lang.EntitiesPerformanceTest#testLookupHash has finished! Has it failed? true
org.apache.commons.lang.EntitiesPerformanceTest#testLookupTree has finished! Has it failed? true
org.apache.commons.lang.EntitiesPerformanceTest#testLookupArray has finished! Has it failed? true
And the trace info are similar:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.commons.lang.EntitiesPerformanceTest.lookup(EntitiesPerformanceTest.java:216)
at org.apache.commons.lang.EntitiesPerformanceTest.testLookupHash(EntitiesPerformanceTest.java:131)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:176)
at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:141)
at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:122)
at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:142)
at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:125)
at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:129)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:255)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:250)
at org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:84)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:160)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:138)
at com.gzoltar.internal.core.test.junit.JUnitTestTask.call(JUnitTestTask.java:67)
at com.gzoltar.internal.core.test.junit.JUnitTestTask.call(JUnitTestTask.java:27)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Environment (please complete the following information, if relevant):
Ubuntu 20.04.2
Additional comments
I checked the test file, and a lot of methods in it were commented out as "Defects4j flaky methods ".
I noticed that in Evaluating and Improving Fault Localization Techniques, there were logics that handle the case when GZoltar and D4J do not agree with the failing test cases. It would be great if you could share a bit on how you handle the situation.
I would really appreciate it if you could provide some insights. Thank you!