-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
Open
Labels
Description
User Story
In order to respond to OIG follow-up question #8, the Data.gov team wants to clarify and document which FISMA system boundary covers Data.gov's API (Q-Data vs. Q-API_Data).
Background
Source: OIG follow-up question #8, received after 2/6/26 GSA response.
OIG wants to understand the authorization boundary for Data.gov's API. There are two potentially relevant FISMA systems:
- Data.gov (Q-Data) - the main Data.gov system
- api.data.gov (Q-API_Data) - the GSA-wide API management proxy layer
The answer likely depends on whether Data.gov's catalog API routes through the api.data.gov proxy or is served directly from the catalog application. This distinction matters for understanding which ATO covers the API and which security controls apply.
OIG Requirement: Clarify system boundary.
Provide to Sue by 2/18
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Status
📟 Sprint Backlog [7]