Skip to content

Add advanced rbacdefinition validation #103

@sudermanjr

Description

@sudermanjr

Combining the requests of both #99 and #101, it would be very beneficial to end users to have some extended validation of the rbacdefintion. This issue will serve as a proposal and tracking issue for that request.

Things to be validated:

  • Namespaces referenced by rbacdefinition currently exist
  • Roles/ClusterRoles that are referenced in rbacdefinition currently exist
  • ServiceAccounts referenced by rbacdefition do not exists, or if they do, let the user know? Defined by results of Verify behavior around pre-existing service accounts #84

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementAdding additional functionality or improvementshelp wantedExtra attention is neededpinnedPrevents stalebot from removingpriority: couldFuture work depending on bandwidth and availability

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions