Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
569 lines (417 loc) · 15.5 KB

File metadata and controls

569 lines (417 loc) · 15.5 KB

OSS Release Readiness Framework

Version: 1.0.0 Status: Live Last Updated: 2026-02-08 Purpose: Systematic framework for preparing private repositories for open-source release

Critical: This framework ensures IP clearance, security review, and trace cleanup before transitioning private repositories to public OSS with Apache 2.0 license.


🎯 Overview

This document provides a comprehensive checklist and workflow for releasing projects as open-source software (OSS). It covers:

  1. Pre-Requisites — IP clearance, security review, documentation
  2. Audit — 10x audit for sensitive data, internal references, security stack
  3. Review — Staged review (stg → uat → rc) before public release
  4. Release — Visibility change, license application, community preparation
  5. Post-Release — Trace cleanup, monitoring, community engagement

✅ OSS Release Checklist

Phase 1: Pre-Requisites

  • Legal Clearance

    • IP ownership confirmed (no third-party code without attribution)
    • Trademark clearance for project names
    • Patent review completed (if applicable)
    • Export control compliance verified (ITAR, EAR)
    • Apache 2.0 license compatibility checked for all dependencies
  • Security Stack Clearance

    • No hardcoded credentials (API keys, passwords, tokens)
    • No internal network references (VPNs, internal IPs, domains)
    • No PII or sensitive user data
    • No proprietary algorithms or trade secrets
    • Dependency vulnerability scan completed (Dependabot, Snyk)
  • Documentation Readiness

    • README.md with clear purpose, installation, usage
    • LICENSE file (Apache 2.0)
    • CONTRIBUTING.md for community guidelines
    • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
    • SECURITY.md for vulnerability reporting
    • CHANGELOG.md for version history
  • Code Quality

    • All tests passing
    • Code coverage >70% (recommended)
    • Linting and formatting applied
    • No TODOs or FIXMEs referencing internal systems
    • Architecture documentation complete

Phase 2: Audit (10x Review)

  • Automated Scans

    • git log reviewed for sensitive commit messages
    • git grep for API keys, passwords, tokens
    • git grep for internal domains/IPs (e.g., .internal, 192.168, 10.0)
    • git grep for employee names, emails, internal org references
    • File path audit for sensitive directories (e.g., /Users/, /home/, company names)
    • Binary files audit (screenshots, PDFs, images with EXIF data)
    • Dependency audit (npm audit, pip-audit, bundle-audit)
  • Manual Review

    • All markdown files reviewed for internal references
    • All code files reviewed for proprietary logic
    • Configuration files sanitized (no internal endpoints)
    • Test data sanitized (no real user data)
    • Comments reviewed for internal context leaks
  • History Audit

    • Git history reviewed for sensitive commits
    • Decision: Keep history or squash/rewrite (BFG Repo-Cleaner if needed)
    • Large files removed (Git LFS or .gitignore)
    • Orphaned branches deleted

Phase 3: Staging Review (private → private → private)

  • Stage 1: Development (stg branch)

    • All audit issues resolved
    • Documentation updated
    • Tests passing
    • Peer review completed
  • Stage 2: UAT (uat branch, if applicable)

    • External beta testers (trusted partners) review
    • Security review by external auditor (optional but recommended)
    • Legal final sign-off
  • Stage 3: Release Candidate (rc branch)

    • Final smoke test
    • CHANGELOG.md finalized
    • Version tagged (v1.0.0)
    • Release notes prepared

Phase 4: Release (private → public)

  • Repository Setup

    • GitHub repository settings reviewed:
      • Description clear and public-friendly
      • Topics/tags added for discoverability
      • Default branch set (usually main)
      • Branch protection rules configured
    • LICENSE file at root (Apache 2.0)
    • SECURITY.md with vulnerability reporting process
    • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (Contributor Covenant recommended)
    • Issue templates configured (.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/)
    • PR templates configured (.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md)
  • Visibility Change

    • CRITICAL: Final backup of private repo before visibility change
    • Repository visibility changed to Public
    • Confirm public URL accessible
    • Confirm all files visible as expected
  • Community Preparation

    • GitHub Discussions enabled (optional)
    • Initial issues created (e.g., "good first issue" labels)
    • README badges added (build status, license, version)
    • Social media announcement prepared (optional)
    • Hacker News/Reddit post prepared (optional)

Phase 5: Post-Release Cleanup

  • Trace Removal from Original Private Repo

    • Internal references cleaned from commit messages (if needed)
    • Internal branches deleted
    • Old forks archived
    • CI/CD secrets rotated
    • Internal DNS entries removed (if project had internal staging URLs)
  • Monitoring & Engagement

    • GitHub watch notifications enabled
    • First issues/PRs responded to within 48 hours
    • Security vulnerability reports monitored
    • Community Code of Conduct enforced

🔍 Project-Specific Audit Checklists

US-Gov/DOGE (Government Efficiency)

Status: Framework-first
OSS Readiness: NOT READY — Contains policy-sensitive content

Blockers:

  • Review for government agency attribution (may require neutral language)
  • Confirm no FOUO (For Official Use Only) content
  • Verify no specific budget numbers or internal agency data
  • Review metaphor/branding for neutrality (DOGE may be politically charged)

Recommendation: Create sanitized version or publish as "Government Efficiency Framework (GEF)" with generic language.


One-Shot Methodology

Status: R&D Core
OSS Readiness: READY (with minor cleanup)

Cleanup Required:

  • Remove legacy WSO file path references (e.g., /workspaces/WSO/)
  • Update GEMINI-INVITE.md, GPT-RED-TEAM-INVITE.md file paths to relative paths
  • Remove personal computer screenshots (if any contain sensitive data)
  • Sanitize file names with special characters (⚔️ emojis may cause issues on some systems)

Recommendation: Quick cleanup and release as "One-Shot Methodology for AI-Assisted Development"


Alliance-to-Empire

Status: Ideation Platform
OSS Readiness: READY (after review)

Cleanup Required:

  • Review Tom-and-Jerry-2026.md for internal references
  • Confirm no client/customer data in examples
  • Update any internal architecture diagrams

Recommendation: Release as "Alliance-to-Empire: AI-Powered Ideation Platform"


AI-Guardrails-and-Bias

Status: Ethics and Bias Analysis
OSS Readiness: READY

Cleanup Required:

  • Review case studies for attribution and citations
  • Confirm no proprietary research data
  • Add disclaimers for opinionated content (e.g., GPT5-FOOTNOTE-FAILURE-CASE-STUDY.md)

Recommendation: Release as "AI Guardrails and Bias: Case Studies and Analysis"


Prince-of-Persia (Narrative Research)

Status: Draft
OSS Readiness: NOT READY — Incomplete content

Blockers:

  • Only CHAPTER-02 exists; missing CHAPTER-01 and context
  • Purpose unclear for external audience

Recommendation: Hold until narrative research is complete or repurpose as examples.


🛡️ Security Stack Clearance (Template)

Repository: __________________

Audit Date: __________
Auditor: __________
Sign-Off: __________

Clearance Checklist

  • Credentials Scan:

    git grep -i "password\|api_key\|secret\|token\|bearer" --all

    Result: __________________

  • Internal Network References:

    git grep -E "\\.internal|192\\.168|10\\.|corp\\." --all

    Result: __________________

  • Personal Data:

    git grep -E "[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}" --all

    Result: __________________

  • Hardcoded Paths:

    git grep -E "/Users/|/home/|C:\\\\" --all

    Result: __________________

  • Dependency Vulnerabilities:

    # Python
    pip-audit
    # Node.js
    npm audit
    # Ruby
    bundle audit

    Result: __________________

Sign-Off

  • Security clearance approved by: __________________
  • Legal clearance approved by: __________________
  • Date: __________________

📋 Staging Workflow (Private → Public)

Step 1: Private Staging (stg branch)

# Create OSS-ready branch
git checkout -b oss-prep
git branch stg-oss

# Apply all cleanup changes
# (Remove sensitive data, update docs, add LICENSE)

# Push to private repo for review
git push origin stg-oss

Step 2: UAT Review (rc branch)

# Merge to RC for final review
git checkout rc
git merge stg-oss

# Tag RC version
git tag -a v1.0.0-rc1 -m "Release Candidate 1 for OSS"
git push origin rc --tags

Step 3: Public Release

# After final approval, change repo visibility to Public via GitHub UI

# Verify public access
curl -I https://github.com/FMI-Test/TomWizMaster

# Announce release
# (Create GitHub Release, post to social media, etc.)

📜 Apache 2.0 License Setup

Add LICENSE File

Create LICENSE at repository root:

Apache License
Version 2.0, January 2004
http://www.apache.org/licenses/

[Full Apache 2.0 license text]

Note: Current repo already has LICENSE file. Verify it contains Apache 2.0 text.

Add License Headers to Source Files

For code files, add header:

# Copyright 2026 [Your Organization]
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
# You may obtain a copy of the License at
#
#     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
# limitations under the License.

Update README Badge

Add license badge to README.md:

[![License](https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache%202.0-blue.svg)](https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0)

🧹 Trace Cleanup Procedure

Before Visibility Change

CRITICAL: Complete these steps before changing repository to public.

  1. Audit Git History:

    # Review all commit messages
    git log --all --oneline | grep -i "internal\|private\|secret"
    
    # Review all file paths in history
    git log --all --name-only --pretty=format: | sort -u | grep -E "/Users/|/home/|C:\\\\"
  2. Remove Sensitive Files from History:

    # Use BFG Repo-Cleaner for sensitive file removal
    java -jar bfg.jar --delete-files "{*.key,*.pem,secrets.*}" .git
    
    # Or use git filter-repo (recommended)
    git filter-repo --path-glob '*.key' --invert-paths
  3. Rewrite History (if needed):

    # Squash commits to remove sensitive messages
    git rebase -i --root
    
    # Force push to rewrite history (DESTRUCTIVE!)
    git push origin --force --all
    git push origin --force --tags
  4. Remove Binary Files:

    # Find large files
    git rev-list --objects --all | \
      git cat-file --batch-check='%(objecttype) %(objectname) %(objectsize) %(rest)' | \
      awk '/^blob/ {print substr($0,6)}' | \
      sort -n -k 2 | tail -20
    
    # Remove screenshots with potential sensitive data
    git rm Screenshot*.png
    git commit -m "Remove screenshots before OSS release"

After Visibility Change

  1. Verify Public Access:

    # Test anonymous clone
    git clone https://github.com/FMI-Test/TomWizMaster test-public-access
    cd test-public-access
    
    # Verify no sensitive data
    grep -r "password\|secret\|api_key" .
  2. Rotate Secrets:

    • Rotate all API keys referenced in old commits
    • Update CI/CD secrets
    • Revoke old access tokens
  3. Monitor for Leaks:

    • Set up GitHub secret scanning
    • Monitor for accidental commits of .env files
    • Review PRs for security issues

🚀 Release Announcement Template

GitHub Release Notes

# [Project Name] v1.0.0 - Initial Open Source Release

We're excited to announce the first public release of [Project Name]!

## 🎯 What is [Project Name]?

[Brief description of the project and its purpose]

## ✨ Features

- Feature 1
- Feature 2
- Feature 3

## 📚 Documentation

- [README](link)
- [Getting Started](link)
- [Contributing Guidelines](link)

## 🤝 Contributing

We welcome contributions! Please see our [CONTRIBUTING.md](link) for details.

## 📜 License

This project is licensed under the Apache 2.0 License - see the [LICENSE](link) file for details.

## 🙏 Acknowledgments

[Thank contributors, inspiration, etc.]

📊 OSS Release Status Dashboard

Project IP Clear Security Clear Docs Ready License Public Status
TomWizMaster (Core) Audit Phase
One-Shot Cleanup Phase
Alliance-to-Empire Review Phase
AI-Guardrails-and-Bias Ready
US-Gov/DOGE ⚠️ ⚠️ Blocked (Policy Sensitive)
Prince-of-Persia Not Ready (Incomplete)

Legend:
✅ Complete | ⏳ In Progress | ⚠️ Needs Review | ❌ Not Started


🔧 Automation Scripts

Scan for Hardcoded Secrets

#!/bin/bash
# scan-secrets.sh

echo "Scanning for hardcoded secrets..."

patterns=(
  "password"
  "api_key"
  "api[-_]?key"
  "secret"
  "token"
  "bearer"
  "auth"
  "credentials"
)

for pattern in "${patterns[@]}"; do
  echo "Checking for: $pattern"
  git grep -i "$pattern" --all || echo "  ✅ None found"
done

echo "Scan complete."

Clean Internal References

#!/bin/bash
# clean-internal-refs.sh

echo "Cleaning internal file path references..."

# Find and list files with /Users/ or /home/ paths
git grep -l -E "/Users/|/home/|C:\\\\" | while read file; do
  echo "Found internal path in: $file"
  # Manual review required - don't auto-replace
done

echo "Review complete. Manual cleanup required."

✅ Final Pre-Release Checklist

  • All automated scans completed
  • All manual reviews completed
  • All blockers resolved
  • Legal sign-off obtained
  • Security sign-off obtained
  • LICENSE file present
  • README.md complete
  • CONTRIBUTING.md present
  • CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md present
  • SECURITY.md present
  • All tests passing
  • Version tagged
  • Release notes prepared
  • Backup of private repo created
  • Ready to change visibility to Public

📞 Contact & Escalation

For questions or escalations:

  • Technical: [Maintainer Contact]
  • Legal: [Legal Contact]
  • Security: [Security Contact]

Approval Required From:

  • Technical Lead
  • Legal Counsel
  • Security Team
  • Executive Sponsor (if applicable)

Last Updated: 2026-02-08
Next Review: Before each OSS release