But that brings me to another problem #8, and problems with the API in general. I would prefer a more "magic" API, wherein no type is required, and can be derived by the modelType or the DS.attr() call in the model. Perhaps this is already the case (have not had the chance to verify). If this is the case, then I would like something like this:
{{fm-field value=firstName}}Currently, my needs are such that I would expect to be able to customize the output to be something like this:
<section class="form-field">
<div class="form-label">
<label for="first-name" class="form-field-label">First Name</label>
</div>
<div class="form-controls>
<input type="text" id="first-name" placeholder="First Name" autofocus required />
</div>
</section>
Notice how autofocus and required are specified based on the model declaration. I would expect to be do something along the lines of ember validations, where the validation can be specified on each model.
But that brings me to another problem #8, and problems with the API in general. I would prefer a more "magic" API, wherein no
typeis required, and can be derived by themodelTypeor theDS.attr()call in the model. Perhaps this is already the case (have not had the chance to verify). If this is the case, then I would like something like this:Currently, my needs are such that I would expect to be able to customize the output to be something like this:
Notice how
autofocusandrequiredare specified based on themodeldeclaration. I would expect to be do something along the lines of ember validations, where the validation can be specified on each model.