Add benefit for top contributors (“celebrities”) to DUG presentations

[Stanislaw-bnk]

As discussed, we want to provide a benefit for selected community members – top contributors from the "community status" list – by recognizing them as “celebrities” of the Dasharo community.

Action items:

• Reach out directly via Matrix to those selected contributors.
• Offer them manual registration for Dasharo User Group & vPub
• Register them manually if they accept.
• Mention this manual-registration perk as a benefit in the DUG presentation.

This will serve as a small token of appreciation for their contributions and help build community engagement.

[pietrushnic]

@Stanislaw-bnk thank you.

[pietrushnic]

This was announced during DUG#10, and I will repeat that on DUG#11. The question is what we need more to make it happen? @rafkoch cc

[Stanislaw-bnk]

@pietrushnic I see the main recommendation for this benefit is to register a ticket on our end. However we no longer encourage registration since we removed the password requirement for logging to Jitsi channel. It seems no longer useful.
We also no longer wait five weeks to publish materials. We publish right after the event and promote the video on selected social media channels.
Is this issue still relevant? If so how should its assumptions change?
@rafkoch cc

[pietrushnic]

@pietrushnic I see the main recommendation for this benefit is to register a ticket on our end. However we no longer encourage registration since we removed the password requirement for logging to Jitsi channel.

Honestly, I don't remember what automatic vs manual registration was. We have a better explanation of the perks we could provide to the most active community members in presentations. I linked that; otherwise, it can be grep.

Flare on matrix could also be a thing. Giving higher privilege, also, if there is any.

It seems no longer useful. We also no longer wait five weeks to publish materials. We publish right after the event and promote the video on selected social media channels. Is this issue still relevant? If so how should its assumptions change? @rafkoch cc

I agree with that, but as I said, there are different preks more tangible in the proposal in DUG#10 presentation, IIRC.