Badge/bar color does not match feature direction

[rmohan91]

See screenshot and code attached:

loancases.zip

[rmohan91]

Additionally, negative framing now no longer flips the weights (just the color):

Same thing also occurs for badges.

[Dark3clipse]

Can you post your explanation.json? This is easier than loading the notebook. If I recall correctly this behavior is intended, but I will investigate the issue and if this is indeed intended I will provide proper argumentation for this behavior.

[rmohan91]

But if you compare the lime explanation with the positive framed explanation, the colors don't match. Is that intended?(see lime screenshot) Also in this case, if framing is negative and we take checking_status, wouldn't checking status contribute negatively to ineligibility (-15.89%)? How can I retrieve the explanation.json from the notebook?

[rmohan91]

Here is the json file:
loanexample.zip

[rmohan91]

Hi Sophia,
After our conversation yesterday, I cloned the repository and ran the example file provided in the repository (I did not modify anything else). Therefore, I'm sure I am using the latest version of argueview. The problem still persists. I tested two cases; 137 which is loan ineligible and 60 which is loan eligible.

For case 137, when lct = none and framing = negative, the bar direction and weight values are incorrect. For the other cases they work as expected.
Here is the json file:
loanexamplenegativedecisionclass.zip

For case 60, none of the vizualizations are correct.
Here is the json file:
loanexamplepositivedecisionclass.zip

Hope you can replicate this.
Ps. In the example file, argView.classes(["You are applicable for a loan.", "You are not applicable for a loan."]) should be flipped around so it coincides with the actual prediction.