Implicit transformations in patch_function
#294
Closed
d-chambers
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
We now have some functions (eg spectral whitening, correlation) that can handle inputs in time or frequency domain in a more explicit way so I think this can be closed for now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
A number of current or planed processing methods (
whitenandcorrelatecome to mind) involve processing in the frequency domain. This involves a dft, performing the processing, and an inverse dft. As many of these might be used together, it would be nice if these functions were flexible enough to take a time domain or frequency domain patch, and the output would match the input domain.Specifically, I am thinking of adding some parameter to the
patch_functiondecorator which would handle the input/output transformations (if applicable) so the processing functions can assume a frequency domain patch as input and return a frequency domain patch. I am not sure what this should look like yet, but as an initial thought:I suppose we might also need a
transform_kwargsargument as well to be able to pass arguments to the transform implementation. Can anyone else think of a cleaner way to to do it?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions