-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
Description
First of all, depending on the outcome of this discussion, this might turn into a feature request, but for now I’d like to simply ask this as a question.
I fully understand that MasterMemory is designed to provide a table structure for managing multiple data entries by ID. However, in practice, there are cases where master data consists of only a single record.
One possible approach would be to put that single record into a table and always query it by a fixed ID. That works, but it feels a bit awkward.
Since the auto-generated MemoryDatabase class is both sealed and non-partial, I cannot directly add a field for a single record. The best workaround I’ve come up with so far is to add an extension method to supplement this use case.
So my question is:
- Is there a recommended way to handle such single-record master data?
- Or is this kind of use case outside the intended scope of MasterMemory?
I’d love to hear your thoughts.