|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +layout: post |
| 3 | +type: socratic |
| 4 | +title: "Socratic Seminar 76" |
| 5 | +meetup: https://www.meetup.com/chibitdevs/events/312832542 |
| 6 | +--- |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +## Announcements |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +Please join us for our next Socratic Seminar! A special thanks to Strike for the event space. |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +Doors open at 6pm with discussion starting shortly after! |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +[Follow ChiBitDevs on twitter](https://x.com/chibitdevs) |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## Chicago Bitcoin Collective Co-working Space Live! |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +<https://www.chicagobitcoincollective.com/> |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## Google Quantum AI Cuts ECDSA Attack to 1,200 Qubits |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +Google Quantum AI dropped a paper showing they can theoretically crack Bitcoin's ECDSA with fewer than 1,200 logical qubits. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +<https://quantumai.google/static/site-assets/downloads/cryptocurrency-whitepaper.pdf> |
| 25 | +<https://www.tftc.io/google-quantum-bitcoin-ecdsa-post-quantum-shrimps/> |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +## ProductionReady Launches |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +"We're a 501(c)3, or in more plain language, a non-profit. We exist for the purpose of both educating new developers and funding another implementation. And we want that implementation to be conservative." |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +<https://productionready.org/blog/productionready-launches> |
| 32 | +<https://x.com/jimmysong/status/2036203291164500205> |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +## Two Block Fork/Reorg |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +Rare-ish two block fork/reorg between Foundry and AntPool+ViaBTC. Foundry mined six blocks in a row. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +<https://bnoc.xyz/t/two-block-reorg-at-height-941880/97> |
| 39 | +<https://bnoc.xyz/t/two-block-reorg-at-height-941880/97/28> |
| 40 | +<https://x.com/wk057/status/2036674054971703361> |
| 41 | +<https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/where-does-the-33-33-threshold-for-selfish-mining-come-from/1757#p-5233-the-selfish-mining-strategy-1> |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +## Concensus Cleanup Demo |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +A demo to let end users see for themselves the impact of hard to validate blocks. We have crafted a series of 6 blocks that are hard to validate, but not too much. Each should take between a handful of seconds and one minute to validate, depending on the hardware. @ajtowns is going to mine the six blocks in a row and then reorg them out, so that anyone running a Signet node at the time would see them, but they would not impose a cost to IBD forever. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +<https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/consensus-cleanup-demo-of-slow-blocks-on-signet/2367> |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +## Channel Splicing Merged into BOLT Specifications |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +Splicing allows spending the current funding transaction to replace it with a new one that changes the capacity of the channel, allowing both peers to add or remove funds to/from their channel balance. |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +<https://github.com/lightning/bolts/blob/master/02-peer-protocol.md#channel-splicing> |
| 54 | +<https://github.com/lightning/bolts/pull/1160> |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +## Evidence of Bitcoin Node Sybil Attack |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +Node counts have shown some anomolies that are congruent with what a node sybil attack may look like. |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +<https://x.com/lopp/status/2036055358767292799> |
| 61 | +<https://x.com/willcl_ark/status/2037491687019147349> |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +## Machine Payments Protocol |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +The open protocol for machine-to-machine payments. Charge for API requests, tool calls, or content—agents and apps pay per request in the same HTTP call. |
| 66 | + |
| 67 | +<https://x.com/tempo/status/2034253707303338264> |
| 68 | +<https://mpp.dev/> |
0 commit comments