Skip to content

Considering Bakta for genome annotation - requested enhancement #177

@vascokarla

Description

@vascokarla

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
PHoeNIx uses Prokka for genome annotation, but it’s no longer actively maintained. We’ve noticed differences in annotations between Prokka and Bakta, and since Prokka isn’t updated anymore, it might not be the best option for current workflows, especially for downstream pangenome analyses.

Describe the solution you’d like
Switch to using Bakta for genome annotation. Bakta is actively maintained and produces annotations that align better with current needs.

Describe alternatives you’ve considered

  • Sticking with Prokka: This risks using outdated software with no updates.
  • Trying Bakta seems to be the best option right now for accuracy and maintenance.

Additional context
We rely on GFF files for pangenome analysis and have observed notable differences between Prokka and Bakta annotations, which could impact our results. Currently, we run Bakta as an additional step in our pipelines, but the annotation process is time-consuming. Integrating Bakta directly into PHoeNIx would streamline our workflow and improve efficiency.

Thanks to all of the developers! PHoeNIx works great for us!

Best,
Karla

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions