Support for private container registries (Bicep modules)? #354
Unanswered
SvenAelterman
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Anyone? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
If it cannot access a private registry directly, it would be nice if it could support using the local bicep modules cache in $Env:BICEP_CACHE_DIRECTORY, such that it could evaluate the current main.bicep, parameters and any upstream modules included main.bicep and other referenced bicep files or modules. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
It appears that Template Analyzer fails on analyzing Bicep files that reference modules in private container registry. This is probably not surprising, as there appears to be no way to provide Template Analyzer with a credential to authenticate against the private registry.
Is this a known issue? Is there a workaround?
PS: this is coming from a use case that involves Defender for Cloud DevOps Security.
PPS: scanning of the Bicep modules that are pushed to the registry is already in place.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions