[Issue] `azd down` error when deleting layers that have `AZURE_LOCATION` defined as output

[puicchan]

Output from azd version
Run azd version and copy and paste the output here: azd version 1.22.5 (commit f1850eb)

Describe the bug
I used layer provisioning to set up VNET and a simple ACA app (sample: https://github.com/[puicchan/cat-aca-vnet.) All networking resources are created in a separate resource group '${abbrs.resourcesResourceGroups}${environmentName}-network' (https://github.com/puicchan/cat-aca-vnet/blob/main/infra/network/main.bicep#L21)

I ran azd down and hit an error in Layer: network.

PS D:\Code\cat-aca-vnet> azd down

Deleting all resources and deployed code on Azure (azd down)
Local application code is not deleted when running 'azd down'.

Layer: main

• Container Registry: cr4chmm45qi5qp4
• Log Analytics workspace: log-4chmm45qi5qp4                                                   
• Application Insights: appi-4chmm45qi5qp4
• Portal dashboard: appid-4chmm45qi5qp4
• Container Apps Environment: cae-4chmm45qi5qp4
• Container App: ca-web-4chmm45qi5qp4

? Total resources to delete: 8, are you sure you want to continue? Yes
Deleting your resources can take some time.e you want to continue? (y/N) y

(✓) Done: Deleted resource group rg-cat15

Layer: network

ERROR: deleting infrastructure: error deleting Azure resources: deployment not found

To Reproduce

1. `azd init -t puicchan/cat-aca-vnet
2. azd up
3. azd down

Expected behavior
I should at least be prompted if I want to delete rg-xxx-network.

[weikanglim]

My best guess is removing AZURE_LOCATION as a Bicep output would fix this. This wouldn't cause any changes in observable behavior. Specifically, this line of change.

I'm still digging into what might be a good option here. azd is invalidating outputs for each layer, which ends up removing AZURE_LOCATION when main is deleted.

[puicchan]

Doesn't work. azd up error out:

  (x) Failed: Resource group: rg-cat1626 (1.24s)
  |     ==| Creating/Updating resources
ERROR: error executing step command 'provision': deployment failed: error deploying infrastructure: deploying to subscription:                                                                          
                                                                                                    
Deployment Error Details:                                                                           
InvalidResourceGroupLocation: Invalid resource group location 'eastus2'. The Resource group already exists in location 'westus'.
                                                                                                    
TraceID: dd0f89916fd1f0397f4031bf913c9956

[weikanglim]

@puicchan That looks like something else. I suspect it could have stemmed from the resource group not being deleted previously.

From the error message, it's possible that rg-cat1626 was an existing resource group created in eastus2. Do you mind trying it again with a different environment name?

[puicchan]

@puicchan That looks like something else. I suspect it could have stemmed from the resource group not being deleted previously.

From the error message, it's possible that rg-cat1626 was an existing resource group created in eastus2. Do you mind trying it again with a different environment name?

I created a new env. I need to azd up before I can run azd down. This error occurred during azd up which means I cannot remove this line. After re-adding L123 and L124, azd up was successful.

[puicchan]

@puicchan That looks like something else. I suspect it could have stemmed from the resource group not being deleted previously.
From the error message, it's possible that rg-cat1626 was an existing resource group created in eastus2. Do you mind trying it again with a different environment name?

I created a new env. I need to azd up before I can run azd down. This error occurred during azd up which means I cannot remove this line. After re-adding L123 and L124, azd up was successful.

Tested using a diff machine. azd down is working with the workaround (removed the 2 lines as you suggested.)