-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
Open
Description
Hi,
I am testing the GaMMA associator to associate picks of shallow seismic events, including quarry blasts following the examples provided e.g. in SeisBench. This are the parameters in the config dictionary:
config = {'use_amplitude': False, 'dims': ['x(km)', 'y(km)', 'z(km)'], 'vel': {'p': 5.6, 's': 3.9},
'use_dbscan': False, 'dbscan_min_samples': 3, 'dbscan_eps': 30, 'min_picks_per_eq': 3,
'oversample_factor': 10, 'x(km)': (1e-3 * ev_east - 111.11, 1e-3 * ev_east + 111.11),
'y(km)': (1e-3 * ev_nort - 111.11, 1e-3 * ev_nort + 111.11), 'z(km)': (0, 50), 'max_sigma11': 2.0,
'max_sigma22': 1.0, 'max_sigma12': 1.0, 'method': 'BGMM'}
ev_east and ev_north are the event easting and northing, which I know beforehand.
The parameter selection does not seem to be optimal for the picks I am trying to associate, as many picks which clearly correspond to my event of interest are ignored, as you can see in this plot:
Do you have any suggestions?
Cheers!
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels
