Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Yeah this would be useful for local webpages and for testing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Fixed by #95 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am working around the basic authentication requirement for websockets with a python shim so that I can access the websocket from javascript in a local browser. It would be nice if there was an option to do basic authentication via the url instead of the http header. For example:
Current browsers do not support passing custom header information to websockets, and they are unlikely to ever allow it based on this SO post: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4361173/http-headers-in-websockets-client-api
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions